Peter McWilliams On
Non-Violence:
"Socrates, Jesus, and Martin Luther King
did more for their causes by dying for them than by killing for them."
February 21, 1999 See
A Message from Peter
McWilliams Announcing A Press Conference
And A Statement Of Support From California State Senator Vasconcellos.
(Marijuananews note: I strongly believe that non-violence and a commitment to the truth
are what sets the anti-prohibitionist movement apart from the prohibitionists.
See
Today Would Have Been
Martin Luther King Jr.s 70th Birthday.
His Message Of Non-Violence Is More Important Than Ever.
However, it is easy for me to advocate non-violence. I have not been a victim of the
governments aggression.
Here Peter McWilliams, who is suffering greatly as the result of the state violence
against medical marijuana users, makes the case for non-violence with the moral authority
that only a victim of violence such as King and Mandela can bring to the subject.)
From Peter McWilliams:
I have gotten several messages such as this one, and I thought I would circulate widely
my response:
"I am curious - and I hope you do not think that this is disrespectful. You do not
strike me as a man who believes in god (I am an agnostic myself), and surely your cause is
just. Since you appear to be condemned to death in the near future, What would be the
consequences of your acquiring weapon, and using it on some of these overzealous people?
and have you thought of this?"
[NOTE TO DEA: This e-mail, along with all similar e-mails, have been completely removed
from my computer, so please dont come into my house, again, and take my computer,
again, just to find out who your enemies may be.]
My response:
Yes, I am an agnostic, but that would make me no more violence-prone than True
Believers. Indeed, unlike, say, abortion-clinic bombers, I dont pretend I am
"doing Gods work" and that I will "find my reward in heaven."
Besides, to "off" those who spout ideas I find harmful is very much like
arresting a drug dealera dozen more are waiting to take his place. And youve
created a martyr for an evil cause.
My enemy is ignorance, not individuals.
It is winning the war of ideasthough fact, logic, persuasion, and, yes,
humorthat brings about lasting change.
What we are facing today in America is not an evil dictator, like
Hitler, who is the head of a snake, and once removed the snake will perish, but overgrown
bureaucracies, like the Drug War, which is more like an anthill. No matter how many
individual ants you kill one at a time, the colony goes on.
Any idiot with a gun can kill. It takes clever perseverance to make lasting change.
Socrates, Jesus, and Martin Luther King did more for their causes by dying for them
than by killing for them. Not that Im looking to be a martyr. Not that the Drug War
NEEDS another martyr. But the Drug War certainly doesnt need a lone gunman, either.
I am not a pacifist, however. If someone were physically coming at me with violence in
his heart, I would have no trouble shooting his balls off. But the people who are coming
at me now do so under rule of law, and that means the law must be changed, not that those
who follow the law (or even make the law or endorse an unjust law) must be
"eliminated" Michael Corleone style.
If there is anything I believe in, it is that we have the right to do with our own
person and property whatever we choose, as long as we do not encroach upon the equal
rights of others to do whatever they choose with their person or property. This, I
believe, is the true definition of "rule of law," the agreement by which we can
live in a society that rises above the law of the jungle.
This is heart of the Declaration of Independence:
"WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of HappinessThat to secure these Rights, Governments
are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed,
that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its
Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
This is what is laid out in the Preamble to the Constitution. In my view, this country
is founded on that.
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote
the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
As has been proven with time and again, to "alter" the government in this
country does not take violence, but education. My job is to get the country back into
believing and living under the "supreme law" of the Constitution, not to kill
those who are, while living under the same Constitutional protections, leading the country
astray.
Although I consider, for example, William J. Bennett to be the
single most evil and hypocritical person in this country, I will defend with my life his
right to be wrong. (In a sense, I am doing just that.) As long as he does not advocate
picking up guns and killing the "pagans" such as myself, he can dance naked in
front of me on a rifle range (what a distasteful image) and I will not lift my gun. (I
might, however, pull out my video camera.) Besides, Id much rather see him live to
watch his ideas (and him) wither and go pathetically out of fashion.
(They already
are, and he knows it, as his book "The Death of Outrage" clearly indicates. He
just pouts and pouts and wallows in his own self-destructive bile. Thats much more
enjoyable for me to watch than, say, hearing that someone shot him while yelling,
"Sic Semper Tyrannous!")
"I would give the devil himself benefit of law for mine own safety sake,"
Robert Bolt had Thomas More saying in "A Man for All Seasons." I believe this to
be true.
The Drug War is intellectually bankrupt, and the Internet is getting the truth (as in
scientific fact) to millions more than ever before. The Drug War propaganda machine, who
can afford to spend billions controlling information, now has thousands of new enemies
online, hosting web sites for $14.95 a month, emanating the truth 24 hours a day. (See my
essay at http://www.marijuanamagazine.com/toc/whatcanido.htm)
150 years ago John Stuart Mill, in "On Liberty," I think, talked about the
"collision" of ideas in a free marketplace of ideas, and from the light of that
collision, the truth is there for all to see. I believe in this process. I believe it is
happening. I believe change is happening at exponential rates. Murder drags the level of
that discussion down to primordial levels and degrades those who take part in it. (Even
most of those who are antiabortion, for example, are repulsed by the abortion clinic bomb
that permanently mangled the nurse and killed a doctor.)
I support the high road of truth, facts, debate, and education,
even if Im not along to walk that road much longer, and even if lies, deception,
repression, and ignorance are the direct cause of my death.
Enjoy,
Peter McWilliams